Determination of Fault Following T-Bone Collision

This article focuses on any T-bone collisions that might take place in Ontario, Canada. Ontario’s insurance companies always study the percent of fault for all the drivers that have been involved in any accident. In Canada, insurers always increase the premium of any policy holder that has been declared more than 25% responsible for any given accident.

The 2 general types of T-bone collisions

One vehicle that is moving in a straight line hits a second vehicle, which is in the process of making a left hand turn.
One vehicle that has entered an intersection gets struck by or perhaps strikes a second vehicle, one in which the driver has ignored a traffic signal or a traffic sign.

A 3rd situation that seems to invite the occurrence of a T-bone collision

This is any situation in which two or more vehicles try to park in a limited amount of space. It could be that one of the drivers fails to look in all directions before proceeding to move a given vehicle. Often the 2 drivers offer entirely different stories, concerning the events that contributed to occurrence of a given crash.

How does the truth get uncovered from the 2 vastly different stories?

The availability of witnesses helps to shed light on the truth of one or both stories. That fact highlights the value in taking down the names and contact information of any witnesses that can be found at the site where two or more vehicles have collided.

The presentation of valuable evidence can make it easier to show that one driver was more at fault than the others. There are seldom any tire marks at the site where two vehicles formed a sort of T-bone shape. Still, there may be other pieces of evidence available.

Pictures can prove to be important evidence. A photograph can highlight the exact location of a dent. The position and size of a given dent might indicate that the dented automobile was hit from the side. That would mean that the dent had been made by a second vehicle. No respectable insurance company would believe a claim that the car with the dented side had been driven sideways into the automobile owned by the opposing driver.

If any video cameras were operating in the vicinity of the T-bone incident, then that footage can be used to resolve the differences between the stories offered by the two different parties. That fact underscores the reason why each of the opposing drivers could use a good attorney. Lawyers know how to seek out and recover useful video footage of an accident scene. Still, no injury lawyer in Oakville can guarantee the existence of an unobstructed view.