How To Evaluate The Worth of A Personal Injury Case

If you have questions, regarding the worth of your case, you need to ask yourself two questions: What are your damages? What costs have you had to deal with since getting injured? By seeking the answers to those questions, you can gain a better understanding of your case’s worth or value.

Damages suffered by victim of an accident are viewed as compensatory

A portion of the payment for compensatory damages covers the cost of the medical care that has been received up to that point in time. Another portion of that payment is meant to cover the cost of medical care in the future. That figure will be based on the diagnosis of the injury and the information provided by medical experts. According to the Personal Injury Lawyer in Oakville, a third slice of that payment needs to cover the costs of any property damage.

All the other losses for which the accident victim should be compensated

The damaged property will have to be repaired. The person that pays for such repairs must be compensated.

Compensation for loss of income: That includes both the money lost while the victim was recovering and the money that the same victim might have made in the future, if the accident had not caused the victim’s existing injury.

Money for pain and suffering: This is supposed to repay the victim for his or her serious discomfort.

Compensation for emotional distress: That distress has been caused by the emotional and psychological impact of the accident.

Money used to pay for victim’s loss of enjoyment: Loss of ability to pursue a hobby, to exercise and to take part in recreational activities.

Payment for loss of consortium: This reflects the degree to which the accident has affected the victim’s relationship with a spouse.

Things that can lower the amount of damages in need of compensation

• Comparative negligence: The plaintiff is found to be partially at fault. That is a reason that could be used in some courts, but not in all courtrooms.
• Contributory negligence: This denies any compensation to the person that contributed in any way to creating the situation that caused the accident. A court could not point to both comparative negligence and contributory negligence as reasons for lowering the amount of the damages.

A victim’s failure to negotiate the damages: This focuses on those damages which would be considered, during a determination of what must get paid to the victim. The legal system does not allow any victims to determine the method by which they can obtain the level of justice that all victims want and deserve. Instead, a judge and jury must come up with the method to be used for arriving at justice for someone that has suffered a personal injury.